Friday February 03, 2006

EMMA vs. Cobertura for Code Coverage I'm looking to add code-coverage reporting to AppFuse. The two open source libraries I know of to do this are EMMA (CPL) and Cobertura (ASL). Which one is the better library to use? Both projects seem to be actively developed - and there are AppFuse HowTos for both, so the decision making process is a bit difficult.
Any insights into why one tool (or project) is better than the other is appreciated.
Posted in Java
at Feb 03 2006, 05:16:35 PM MST
13 Comments
Search This Site
Recent Entries
- Secure JSON Services with Play Scala and SecureSocial
- My What's New in Spring 3.1 Presentation
- Twitter's Open Source Summit: Bootstrap 2.0 Edition
- Refreshing AppFuse's UI with Twitter Bootstrap
- 2011 - A Year in Review
- Upgrading AppFuse to Spring Security 3.1 and Spring 3.1
- What have I been working on at Taleo?
- Our Engaging Trip to Paris and Antwerp
- My HTML5 with Play Scala, CoffeeScript and Jade Presentation from Devoxx 2011
- Deploying Java and Play Framework Apps to the Cloud with James Ward